UNIFORM CIVIL CODE is a directive principle of Bharat's Constitution but unfortunately could not become reality due to minority appeasement which was part of Nehruvian secularism.
When Rajiv Gandhi relented to the demands o Muslims groups in
Shah Bano Case after which in my opinion India should not claim to be a secular country.
When Shariah is implemented its at the cost of women rights.
Here I am listing some cases that I know in which courts had to give verdict aaginst the Indian laws because of Muslim Personal Law.
SHAH BANO CASE:
Shah Bano, a 62-year-old Muslim,
mother of five from Indore, Madhya Pradesh, was divorced by her husband in 1978 but even after winning the case at the Supreme court of India was subsequently denied alimony because the Indian Parliament reversed the judgement under pressure of Islamic orthodoxy.
A Muslim man has been absolved of charges of illegally confining and raping a minor from the same religion, whom he later married, by a Delhi court which cited the Mahomedan Law that allows a 15-year-old girl to marry against the wishes of her parents.
Delhi Court Acquits Man of Rape Charges Against Minor, Says Victim Was Adult by Muslim Law
https://www.news18.com/news/india/delhi-court-aquits-man-of-rape-charges-against-minor-says-victim-was-adult-by-muslim-law-1724735.html
टिप्पणियाँ
एक टिप्पणी भेजें